Originally appeared at http://www.democracyarsenal.org/2012/03/can-president-obama-live-up-to-the-accomplishments-of-his-predecessors.html.
President Obama was recently overheard
saying to Russian President Medvedev that, assuming he prevails in the
election this November, he would have more flexibility to negotiate on
arms control issues. In response, some Congressional Republicans have
implied that President Obama may have secret plans to aggressively pursue arms control in his second term.
Perhaps Republicans are concerned that
the United States will cut its arsenal in half. Maybe they are
concerned that President Obama will eliminate an entire class of nuclear
weapons. Or, maybe they are concerned he would do something dramatic
like try to negotiate the total elimination of U.S. and Russian nuclear
weapons. Well, if he were to accomplish any of these tasks, he would be
in good company. These are all feats attempted by Republican Presidents
in their second terms. Every second term Republican President since the
beginning of the nuclear age (i.e. Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, and Bush
II) proposed drastic changes to the U.S. nuclear arsenal.
George W. Bush
Most recently, President George W.
Bush made sweeping reductions to the U.S. nuclear arsenal during his
second term. In 2007, President Bush approved a nearly 50 percent cut in
the deployed nuclear stockpile and pledged to cut it by an additional
15% by 2012. Notably, the announcement of these reductions occurred
while the Bush administration was simultaneously planning to cut 7,200
nuclear weapons-related jobs, arguing that the way in which the United States maintained its nuclear weapons was outdated and cost too much.
At the time, not a single prominent
Republican attacked President Bush for pursuing such a policy. In fact,
in 2004, Republican Chairman of the House Energy and Water
Appropriations Subcommittee, which is responsible for funding nuclear
weapons programs at the Department of Energy, applauded President Bush’s effort to reduce nuclear weapons,
stating “it may not be to the degree of where he wants to get right
now, but it’s a lot better than where we are today” and “After years of
maintaining a nuclear stockpile sized for the Cold War, we are finally
bringing the numbers down to a more realistic and responsible level.” In
contrast, Republicans have relentlessly attacked President Obama, who
has provided more money for nuclear weapons than any previous president
and pursued extremely modest reductions by his predecessor’s standards,
because of perceived “underfunding” or lack of commitment to the nuclear
stockpile.
Ronald Reagan
Arguably, President Reagan made more
progress in reducing the threat of nuclear weapons in his second term
than any other President, Democrat or Republican. While his eventual
support for the abolition of nuclear weapons is widely known, his
ambitious efforts to reduce the dangers posed by nuclear weapons deserve
more attention.
Following the 1983 incident in which
Soviet leaders, interpreting a U.S. nuclear exercise as a first strike,
prepared to launch nuclear weapons against the United States, President
Reagan became more hands on in dealing with nuclear weapons policy. In a
1986 meeting in Reykjavik, Iceland, President Reagan and Mikhail
Gorbachev discussed a proposal for completely eliminating Soviet and
U.S. nuclear weapons. Although they were not able to agree on terms,
this marks the closest any President has ever come to abolishing nuclear
weapons altogether. In 1987, President Reagan signed the Intermediate
Nuclear Forces in Europe Treaty (INF). The INF required the United
States and USSR to verifiably eliminate nuclear missiles with ranges
between 300 and 3,400 miles. Throughout this period, the United States
and the Soviet Union negotiated to increase transparency and
verification of nuclear testing and, despite being criticized by his own
party, Reagan made significant progress in negotiating reductions in
deployed strategic nuclear weapons. This negotiation process was
completed by his successor, George H.W. Bush, in the form of the
Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.
Richard Nixon
President Nixon’s second term lasted
slightly over a year and a half; yet, even he was able to make progress
in reducing the threat of nuclear weapons. In 1973, Nixon signed the
Agreement on the Prevention of Nuclear War, helping to reinforce détente
between the United States and the Soviet Union. In 1974, he signed the
Threshold Test Ban Treaty, which prohibited the United States and the
Soviet Union from conducting nuclear tests greater than 150 kilotons, a
precursor to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. During this time, Nixon
also pursued further restrictions on US and Soviet nuclear arms,
building on the Strategic Arms Limitation Agreement (SALT I) between the
Soviet Union and the United States negotiated during his first term.
Dwight Eisenhower
President Eisenhower was certainly no
dove when it came to nuclear weapons, approving significant quantitative
and qualitative increases in the U.S. nuclear arsenal. However, towards
the end of his presidency, Eisenhower also began moving away from his
hawkish nuclear ways. In his second term, Eisenhower began legitimate
negotiations on a verifiable test ban, which included working with
Khrushchev to draft a treaty. In 1959, he was also the first President
to establish a testing moratorium. While the moratorium expired in
December 1959, neither the U.S. nor the Soviet Union tested nuclear
weapons again until 1961.
This brings us to Barack Obama, who of
course has yet to win a second term, but has made no secret of his
goals regarding reducing the threat from nuclear weapons. In a speech
President Obama delivered on March 26 at Hankuk University in Seoul,
Korea, President Obama renewed his pledge to further reduce the threat
of nuclear weapons by “taking concrete steps toward a world without
nuclear weapons.” The speech outlined a number of goals the President
first proposed in Prague in April 2009 and would seek during his second
term, including ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and
further reductions in all types of Russian and U.S. nuclear weapons.
Contrary to arguments put forth by critics, these goals are the
continuation of decades of work by Republican Presidents in their second
terms.
Nick,
ReplyDeleteThanks for posting the article. It was really cool to see how the various Presidents compare on this issue. I'm pretty shock about the party shift in of support nuclear arms control.
When I heard President Obama's comment the other day I was reminded about this crazy conversation I had with my grandfather. He had worked on the Manhattan project and actually held the patent on the particle accelerator on the atomic bomb. He died just after President Obama was elected. Before then he commented to me that he felt that there would be a shift in how we view nuclear power and weapons during his Presidency. While I really wasn't tuned into this in 2008/2009, after fukushima daiichi and this article I've started taking notice.